Penal Code

Posted By on March 27, 2015

2.2. Sumilla does not comprise of the text of the article. In order to maintain that sumilla does not form part of the text of the article we looked for the aid of the Explosion of Reasons for art 317 of Penal Code (2), indeed to know which was the Mind of the Legislator, indeed President of the Commission of Justice Chamorro Balvin says: ” To only establish the following precision: When Art. 317 talks about illicit association does in his sumilla, but not in the text of the article. That is to say, that concept is not part of the penal type.

What yes it is part of the penal type is the concept of agrupacin” It complements Legislator Mulder member Bedoya of the revisory Commission of the Penal Code, says the following thing: ” About Art. 317 referred the Illicit Association To always break the law there has been a debate on the denomination of the crime. Everybody has called to this crime illicit association to break the law, when in fact in the text never it has said that outside to Association but agrupacin”. In summary the penal type that contains article 317 of the Penal Code is ” Grouping ilcita” and not ” Illicit association for delinquir”. III. Modifications introduced to article 317 of penal code 3.1. Project of the Public prosecutor of the Nation (3) in representation of Ministry I publish In the same Exhibition of Reasons for article 317 Penal Code appears the project of the Public Ministry and proposes the modification of the referred article, even though the legal figure of the grouping is legislated pertinent esteem gets up the organization figure, establishing clear differences in the penal type between the grouping to break the law and organization to break the law, if not outside thus there would not be reason to modify it.

About the author

Comments

Comments are closed.